Summary
of Brush Creek Water Quality Monitoring
Objectives
- To finalize data sheets for submittal to the Missouri Volunteer Water
Quality Monitoring Program.
- To prepare summary data sheets to be posted in lab.
- To learn more about the history and the public perception of degraded
water quality in Brush Creek.
Activities
- Transfer all data collected in the field and lab to new datasheets
(visual stream survey, water chemistry, stream discharge, macroinvertebrate
counts, fecal coliform testing).
- Complete data sheets by filling in any blanks:
- find out what the total precipitation was for week preceding field
sampling
- convert stream depths measured in the field from feet/inches to feet/tenths
of a foot
- calculate stream discharge based on measurements made in the field.
- Prepare summary data sheets by entering data into the Excel spreadsheet
provided.
- Read articles from the Kansas City Star concerned with water quality
issues regarding Brush Creek
Outline
Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring
Data Sheets
Your T.A. will provide each group with a new set of data sheets for
each group to fill out. For the most part, this will simply entail transferring
data from your old data sheets onto these new ones. But it will also entail
filling in a few blanks with new data or with data based on calculations
that you and your group still need to make. Please fill these data sheets
out neatly and carefully as we will be submitting them to the volunteer
water quality monitoring program of the Missouri Department of Conservation
and Department of Natural Resources.
1) Visual Stream Survey
Checklist
You and your group should've collected most of the data for this data
sheet during the lab session you spent along Brush Creek. You need,
however, to find out how much precipitation fell on Kansas City during
the 7-day period that preceded the day your group went to Brush Creek to
monitor its water chemistry; you can get this information from the following
web site: http://www.wdaftv4.com/wathisyr.html).
Be sure to fill out the following:
stream name (i.e. Brush Creek) and county (Johnson, KS, or Jackson,
MO)
site number
township-range location
descriptive location
date and time (24-hour time scale; e.g., 1:00 pm is 1300 on a 24-hour
scale)
name of topographic quadrangle map
UTM coordinates
names of everyone in your group
weather
rainfall for the previous 7 days (see the weather data at http://www.wdaftv4.com/wathisyr.html.)
floodplain land use
riparian cover
streambank conditions
composition of riffle
bottom deposits
signs of human use
algae
water color and turbidity
algae
odor
2) Water Chemistry Summary
Sheet
Once again, you and your group should've collected most of the data
for this data sheet during the lab session you spent along Brush Creek.
And once again you need to fill out a blank sheet stating how much precipitation
fell on Kansas City during the 7-day period that preceded your group's
trip to Brush Creek. Fill out the following:
stream name (Brush Creek) and county (Johnson, KS, or Jackson, MO)
names of everyone in your group
site number
township-range location and UTM coordinates
date
rainfall for the previous 7 days
weather conditions at the time you were in the field
time (24-hour time scale)
water temperature (degrees Celsius)
air temperature (degrees Celcius)
dissolved oxygen (in milligrams per liter)
% saturation of water with respect to dissolved oxygen -- ask your
T.A. how this is to be determined
pH
conductivity (in micromhos per centimeter)
Nitrate (in milligrams per liter)
3) Stream Discharge Worksheet
On this sheet, you'll need to do several calculations in order to determine
what the discharge of Brush Creek was when you and your group were in the
field. Also, be sure to fill out the top of the worksheet as you
have the previous two, with the following information:
stream name (Brush Creek) and county (Johnson, KS, or Jackson, MO)
date
site number
township-range location
UTM location
names of everyone in your group
Calculating stream discharge:
- Convert depth measurements from inches to tenths of a foot (you measured
the depth of Brush Creek in inches). Do this by dividing your depth measurement
by 12. (E.g., a depth of 15 inches is equal to 1.25 feet (1.25 = 15/12)
- Determine the average depth of Brush Creek at your site by doing the
following:
- add together all your depth measurements
- divide this total by the number of depth measurements you and your
group made across the stream -- this gives you the average depth
of the stream at your monitoring site
- Determine the cross-sectional area of the creek at your monitoring
site
- multiply the creek's average depth by the width of the steam
- Determine the average velocity of Brush Creek at your site:
- if you measured how long it took an orange (or some other object) to
float down the creek over a prespecified distance more than once,
add together all your measurements (in seconds)
- divide this total by the number of times you floated an orange (or
whatever else) down Brush Creek -- this gives you the average float
time at your monitoring site
- then, divide the distance that your object floated by the average float
time -- this gives you the average velocity of Brush Creek at your
site
- making note of the stream-bottom conditions at your site, select a
correction value
- multipy the average velocity by this correction value to get a corrected
average stream velocity
- Determine the discharge of Brush Creek at you monitoring site:
- multiply the cross-sectional area of the stream by the corrected average
stream velocity -- this will give you stream discharge in cubic feet
per second.
NOTE: If discharge was too low to measure, make a note saying
so on the data sheet.
4) Macroinvertebrate Counts
If you didn't complete the Macroinvertebrate Count sheet last week,
you'll need to do so today:
Fill out the top of the form with stream name, site number, township-range
location, county, UTM coordinates, date that the macroinvertebrates were
collected, and names of everyone in your group.
You and your group should have collected three sets of macroinvertebrates
and identified each set separately, but if you did only one set or two
sets, that's o.k. Whatever you and your group did, be sure to complete
this data sheet by doing the following:
- add together the number of sensitive macroinvertebrates
you found in each set, and put the total number in the box at the bottom
of the SENSITIVE column on the data sheet. Muliply this number
by 3 and put the resulting number on the blank line provided.
- add together the number of somewhat-sensitive macroinvertebrates
you found in each set, and put the total number in the box at the bottom
of the SOMEWHAT-SENSITIVE column on the data sheet. Muliply
this number by 2 and put the resulting number on the blank line
provide
- add together the number of tolerant macroinvertebrates you found
and counted in each set, and put the total number in the box at the bottom
of the TOLERANT column on the data sheet. Muliply this number
by 1 and put the resulting number on the blank line provided
- finally, add the values for the sensitive, somewhat-sensitive, and
tolerant macroinvertebrates together, and using this number, assign a WATER
QUALITY RATING to Brush Creek
5) Fecal Coliform Data Sheet
In completing this form, provide the required information at the top:
- stream name
- county
- volunteers' names (include your T.A.'s name and the name of everyone
who was in the group)
- date
- precipitation for preceding seven days (http://www.wdaftv4.com/wathisyr.html)
- monitoring site number
- township-range location
- date and time when incubation started and when it finished
- answer "Y" or "N" to indicate whether colonies
were or were not present on the positive control (the one someone coughed
on) and on the negative control (the sample of purified water)
Next, fill out the table part of the data sheet. Provide the following
information:
- the monitoring site number
- the time when the sample was collected by your T.A.
- the water temperature at the time the sample was collected
- the air temperature at the time the sample was collected
- the number of colonies that you and your groupmates counted after your
samples had incubated for 24 hours
- the number of colones per 100 ml (to determine this, multiply the number
of colonies you counted by the dilution multiplier)
- the selected value (i.e., the one that falls clearly within the range
where the analytical certainty of this test is the highest)
Excel Spreadsheet Summary
For the next part of this lab, each water-monitoring group is to compile
onto one sheet all of the information its members obtained during the study
of Brush Creek's water quality. (Use the group designation that was
given by your T.A.) The sheet to be filled out is a Microsoft Excel
spreadsheet. The spreadsheet for each group is on a different specific
computer -- your T.A. will direct you to the computer where your group
will find its spreadsheet. Locate the Module 13 folder on
the computer desktop, open it, and double-click on the Excel workbook icon
that is labeled with the appropriate time, day, and group designation.
Then enter the appropriate information the first page of the spreadsheet,
print the page out, and put it up on the poster board that is assigned
to your lab section. Also, make a few pie charts of data in the visual
survey (e.g. floodplain land use and riparian cover), and a column chart
of your group's fecal coliform data to illustrate how colony counts varied
with variations in the amounts of sample water filtered. (If you
need help with creating charts in Excel, ask your T.A. You should
also read the "Creating charts in Excel" document -- to
do this, double-click on the appropriate icon in the Module 13 folder.)
Next, obtain water chemistry data from the other groups in your lab and
enter this data into the table on the second page of your spreadsheet.
Make a few column charts of this data to illustrate the degree to which
water chemistry measurements varied from group to group. As you do
this, try to think of some possible reasons why measurements of water chemistry
would vary between the different groups.
Kansas City Star Newspaper Reports
The quality of Brush Creek's water is a major concern in the Kansas
City metro area. It is a particular concern since the city recently spent
many millions of dollars in an attempt to turn the creek into an urban
park that would help attract people from all over the metro area and beyond
into the urban core. So what is the public perception of the new Brush
Creek? And what is the reality? Navigate to the
Kansas City Star archive collection, and do a search using the search
words "brush creek." Read some of the articles and you will get
an idea of the problems and issues surrounding Brush Creek. The following
list includes several articles related to Brush Creek from 1991 through
1997 that give a good overview of the stream and various concerns confronting
it:
Brush Creek project has a wet beginning, by APRIL D. McCLELLAN (07/04/91)
A new Brush Creek Rockhill to Troost section provides flood project
preview, by JEFFREY SPIVAK (10/25/93)
Asphalt flows after explosion Tank is damaged, and hot material runs
into Brush Creek, by PAULA BARR (10/12/94)
City sweetens Brush Creek's smell Chemicals, bacteria used to attack
odors on eve of dedication, by TRACEY KAPLAN (06/24/95)
Sewage in the stream Brush Creek problem is old, ongoing; Health hazards
are possible, but city tests are faulted, TRACEY KAPLAN (08/20/95)
Bad judgment led to birth of 'Flush Creek' -- many knew Brush Creek
needed more than a face-lift, records show, by PHILLIP O'CONNOR and MARK
MORRIS (10/01/95)
Rain puts KC closer to cure for tainted Brush Creek, by MICHAEL MANSUR
(04/25/96)
Pollution down in Brush Creek Bacteria levels lower. More cleaning
would be costly, report says, by MICHAEL MANSUR (06/21/96)
Ice slows Brush Creek oil cleanup Crews install booms to absorb substance
dumped in storm drain, by SHAWNA HAMEL (02/02/97)
Brush Creek bears sewage overflows, by MICHAEL MANSUR (03/24/97)
Brush Creek oil leak traced to tank at KC apartments, by MICHAEL MANSUR
(04/23/97)
County balks at cleanup spending -- Commissioners want more data before
laying out millions for Brush Creek, by MICHAEL MANSUR (05/23/97)
Brush Creek's birthday After two years, good progress is being made,
by YAEL T. ABOUHALKAH (06/24/97)
Brush Creek is back in trouble, but it's not because of bacteria, by
STEVE PENN (10/17/97)
Go
to Land Use Module
(See
Module #14)
Return
to WEB-LAB home page